Brian Sass v. California Board of Prison Terms Attorney General of the State of California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge.
California state prisoner Brian Sass appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Sass argues that the California Board of Prison Terms’ decisions, in 1999 and 2000, denying him parole violated his due process rights.
We hold that California inmates continue to have a liberty interest in parole after In re Dannenberg, 34 Cal.4th 1061, 23 Cal.Rptr.3d 417, 104 P.3d 783 (2005). However, the state court decisions upholding Sass’ parole denials were not contrary to, and did not involve an unreasonable application of, clearly established…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by183 opinions
- Hayward v. MarshallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Irons v. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Richter v. HickmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Carver v. LehmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Miller v. Oregon Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
178 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.