Legal Opinion

Dooley Improvements, Inc. v. Motor Improvements, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided March 7, 1934No. 957PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NIELDS, District Judge.

Plaintiff moves to dismiss its bill of complaint without prejudice. Defendant resists the motion because during the progress of the case (1) defendant has become entitled to affirmative relief; (2) defendant has filed an, answer containing a counterclaim praying such affirmative relief; and (3) by a decree entered in this ease eliminating the narrow issue of interfering patents defendant has ac*162quired the advantage of trying in this court the broader issues of an infringement suit.

Plaintiff replies to the (2) defense that the counterclaim is ineffectual because filed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. Dooley Improvements, Inc. v. Motor Improvements, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dooley Improvements, Inc. v. NieldsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
  2. Dooley Improvements, Inc. v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1939
  3. Whitall-Tatum v. Corning Glass WorksDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API