Commonwealth v. Perea
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
¶ 1 The sole issue before us in this direct appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying a motion to suppress physical evidence seized by the police, without a warrant, from a parked motor vehicle.
¶ 2 Appellant Adalberto Perea was found guilty in a bench trial of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, and received a sentence of two to four years imprisonment, with boot camp eligibility. He argues that in the absence of exigent circumstances, the search of the car violated Article I, § 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution. Commonwealth v. White, 543 Pa. 45, 669 A.2d 896…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. PetrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Commonwealth v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. PetersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. CabanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Commonwealth v. RosasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Commonwealth v. PowellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.