Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Perea

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 2002PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

¶ 1 The sole issue before us in this direct appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying a motion to suppress physical evidence seized by the police, without a warrant, from a parked motor vehicle.

¶ 2 Appellant Adalberto Perea was found guilty in a bench trial of possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance, and received a sentence of two to four years imprisonment, with boot camp eligibility. He argues that in the absence of exigent circumstances, the search of the car violated Article I, § 8 of the Pennsylvania Constitution. Commonwealth v. White, 543 Pa. 45, 669 A.2d 896…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. PetrollSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. HawkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Commonwealth v. PetersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. BurtonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Commonwealth v. CabanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Commonwealth v. RosasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Commonwealth v. PowellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API