Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Sullivan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 15, 1871PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGhat, J.

This is an appeal from a decree of Mr. Justice Wells, by which a decree of the probate court, allowing as the will of Margaret Súlhvan an instrument which contained a devise to Thomas Sullivan, and to which his wife was one of the three attesting witnesses, was reversed; and the only question is whether upon these facts she was a competent attesting witness to the will.

*475By the law of this Commqnwealth, a will must be attested by three competent witnesses, that is to say, witnesses who at the time of the attestation would be competent by the rules of the common law to testify concerning the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fortune v. BuckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1854
  2. Jackson ex dem. Cooder v. WoodsNew York Supreme Court · 1799
  3. Jackson ex dem. Beach v. DurlandNew York Supreme Court · 1801

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. O'Connell v. DowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  2. Caesar v. BurgessCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  3. In re Holt's WillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. Spaulding v. McConnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  5. Fisher v. SpenceIllinois Supreme Court · 1894

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API