Legal Opinion

Spaulding v. McConnell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 31, 1940PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

These two appeals from decrees of the Probate Court present identical questions as to the construction of a portion of G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 197, § 9. Although no briefs were filed in the first case, the executor in the second case has presented his argument, and we think that both appeals should be disposed of upon their merits.

Except for the fact that the bond of the executrix in the first case was approved on July 5, 1938, and that of the executor in the second case on June 7, 1938, the facts are identical.

Way Spaulding and Virginia C. Spaulding, on May 25, 1939, petitioned the Probate Court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Cochrane v. CochraneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Morrow v. Mason's heirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1859
  3. Opinion of the Justices to the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  4. Attleboro Trust Co. v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Sullivan v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Downey v. Union Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  3. Calcagno v. P. H. Graham & Sons Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  4. Rambert v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. New England Trust Co. v. SpauldingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API