Legal Opinion

Stuhr v. United States Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided December 27, 2023No. 2:23-cv-03357Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA CHARLESTON DIVISION Frederick Stuhr et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-03357-RMG Plaintiffs, v. ORDER AND OPINION United States Army Corps of Engineers Charleston District et al., Defendants. This matter is before the Court on Federal Defendants’1 motion to partially dismiss Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 11). Plaintiffs opposed the motion (Dkt. No. 13), and Federal Defendants replied (Dkt. No. 14). For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies Federal Defendants’ motion. I. Background A mitigation bank is a site where…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Kerns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  5. Michael Lovern, Sr. v. Mark A. Edwards, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Superintendent of the Henrico County Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API