Legal Opinion

Haeussler v. Duross

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 1883PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the St. Louis Circuit Court, Thayer, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.

The petition in this case is substantially as follows: Plaintiff, for himself and all others in interest who may be joined herein, states that on March 15, Í876, Geo. W. Lubke conveyed to defendant a lot in the Grand Prairie common fields, particularly described, on which was erected “ Elleardsville Hall.” This lot was conveyed to Lubke in trust. Amongst the persons beneficially interested in the trust were Hymers, Massey, Sellers, and McGlenn. Defendant executed a declaration of trust, whereby he agreed to receive the rents and profits of the premises, pay all expenses of ownership, and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Spalding v. VandercookNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  2. People v. HumphreyNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  3. Eslow v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Sleght v. RhinelanderNew York Supreme Court · 1806
  5. Storey v. KrewsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. Senter Commission Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  2. Clasen v. Moore Brothers Realty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Hanson v. ToddSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  4. Turner's Sons v. Lee Gin & Machine Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Watson v. Lee Loader & Body Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API