Legal Opinion

United States v. Roy Schmidt, III

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 7, 2010No. 09-31138PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIENER, Circuit Judge:

Defendant-Appellant Roy Schmidt III appeals his designation as an Armed Career Criminal (“ACC”) under the Armed Career Criminal Act 1 (“the ACCA”). Schmidt pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess a pipe bomb and to being a convicted felon in possession of a pipe bomb. He now challenges the district court’s sentencing determination that a prior conviction for theft of a firearm from a licensed gun dealer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(u), is a violent felony for purposes of the ACCA. We affirm.

I. Facts & Proceedings

On and before December 31, 2007, Schmidt agreed with…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Chambers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. Aguila-Montes De OcaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. United States v. Aguila-Montes De OcaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. Sterling JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  4. United States v. ThompsonDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2011
  5. Derby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API