United States v. Roy Schmidt, III
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WIENER, Circuit Judge:
Defendant-Appellant Roy Schmidt III appeals his designation as an Armed Career Criminal (“ACC”) under the Armed Career Criminal Act 1 (“the ACCA”). Schmidt pleaded guilty to conspiracy to possess a pipe bomb and to being a convicted felon in possession of a pipe bomb. He now challenges the district court’s sentencing determination that a prior conviction for theft of a firearm from a licensed gun dealer, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(u), is a violent felony for purposes of the ACCA. We affirm.
I. Facts & Proceedings
On and before December 31, 2007, Schmidt agreed with…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Begay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chambers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Aguila-Montes De OcaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Aguila-Montes De OcaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Sterling JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. ThompsonDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2011
- Derby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.