Legal Opinion

Acme Shear Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 2, 1974No. C.D. 4569; Court No. 73-2-00440PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Boe, Chief Judge:

Plaintiff has moved for summary judgment under rule 8.2 of this court. Defendant, agreeing that no genuine issue of fact exists, has cross-moved for summary judgment in its favor.

From the pleadings and from the testimony submitted by affidavits, it appears that the merchandise in question consists of nonmalleable cast-iron articles not alloyed and not coated or plated with precious metal. The articles, described in the customs invoices as “Grey Iron Castings, Art. 101C,” were imported by the plaintiff from West Germany' and entered at the port of Bridgeport, Connecticut, on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  2. Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  3. Rice Millers' Ass'n v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. B. A. McKenzie & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  5. Strouse v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Acme Shear Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
  2. John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API