Legal Opinion

Vann v. Wardlaw

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 11, 1935No. 10732PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gilbert, Justice.

1. “The Supreme Court shall dispose of every case at the first or second term after such writ of error is brought; and in case the plaintiff in error shall not be prepared at the first term to prosécute the case, unless prevented by providential cause, it shall be stricken from the docket, and the judgment below shall stand affirmed.” Constitution of Georgia, art. 6, sec. 2, par. 6 (Code of 1933, § 2-3006).

2. Rule 32 of the Supreme Court provides: “On the call of a case, if the plaintiff in error be unrepresented, counsel for defendant in error may move to open the record and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Griffith v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Irwin v. Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Long v. Bank of MindenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Church v. PurcellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Hayden v. VarnadoreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API