Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 19, 1903PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

The constitution declares: “The Supreme Court shall dispose of every case at the first or second term after such writ of error is brought; and in case the plaintiff in error shall not be prepared at the first term to prosecute the case — unless prevented by providential cause, — it shall be stricken from the docket, and the judgment below shall stand affirmed.” Civil Code, § 5837. The 24th Rule of the Supreme Court provides: “ On the call of a case, if the plaintiff in error be unrepresented, counsel for defendant in error may move to open the record and insist on an affirmance of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Norrell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  2. Harvey v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. Osborn v. HaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
  4. Irwin v. Atlanta, Knoxville & Northern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  5. Farr v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Thompson v. MasliaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Johansson v. TowsonDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1959
  3. State of Georgia v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Strauss Bros. v. PearlmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  5. Brown v. Western Maryland Ry. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1922

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API