Legal Opinion
Friddle v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Company
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided October 16, 1974No. 45213 and 45214PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
306 So.2d 97 (1974)
Darlene D. FRIDDLE, Petitioner,
v.
SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY and Harold Jefferson Bridges, Respondents.
Darlene D. FRIDDLE, as Administratrix of the Estate of Thomas B. Friddle, a/K/a Thomas Bascom Friddle, Petitioner,
v.
SEABOARD COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY and Harold Jefferson Bridges, Respondents.
Nos. 45213 and 45214.
Supreme Court of Florida.
October 16, 1974.
Rehearing Denied February 4, 1975.
Jack B. Nichols, Nichols & Tatich, Orlando, for petitioners.
Frederick J. Ward, Giles, Hedrick & Robinson, Orlando, for respondents.
2Per curiam
We here review by writs of certiorari the…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Chambers v. LoftinSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Perret v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1974
4Cited by20 opinions
- Lawrence v. Florida East Coast Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1977
- Lasar Mfg. Co., Inc. v. BachanovDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Nance v. Winn Dixie Stores, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Reinhart v. Seaboard Coast Line R. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Warn Industries v. GeistDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.