Legal Opinion

Chambers v. Loftin

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 16, 1953PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

67 So.2d 220 (1953)

CHAMBERS

v.

LOFTIN et al.

Supreme Court of Florida, en Banc.

June 16, 1953.

Rehearing Denied August 10, 1953.

E.F.P. Brigham and Phillip Goldman, Miami, for appellant.

Loftin, Anderson, Scott, McCarthy & Preston, Miami, Russell L. Frink, Jacksonville, Robert H. Anderson and Francis W. Sams, Miami, for appellees.

SEBRING, Justice.

The plaintiff, an employee of the defendants, was injured while attempting to operate a power saw in the shops of the defendants. He instituted suit under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., to recover damages for the injury. At…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Bailey v. Central Vermont Railway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Wilkerson v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Jacksonville, Tampa & Key West Railway Co. v. Peninsular Land, Transportation & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1891
  5. Blair v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. FulmerSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  2. Perret v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  3. Whitman v. Red Top Sedan Service, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  4. Reinhart v. Seaboard Coast Line R. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  5. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. BarrettSupreme Court of Florida · 1958

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API