Legal Opinion
Stanford Square, L.L.C. v. Nomura Asset Capital Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 12, 2002No. 00 CIV. 1001 VMPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MARRERO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Stanford Square, LLC (“Stanford”) invoked the Court’s diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 to assert breach of contract claims against defendant Nomura Asset Capital Corporation (now known and appearing before the Court as Capital Company of America) (“Capital”). Capital filed a counter claim seeking to recover “Hedge Losses” that it contends are due under the Contract. On cross motions for summary judgment, the Court found that Stanford was entitled to a return of a refundable deposit reduced by Capital’s costs, expenses and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kenford Co. v. County of ErieNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Wolff & Munier, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Berley Industries, Inc. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Lexington Products Limited v. B. D. Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Lexington 360 Associates v. First Union National Bank of North CarolinaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stanford Square, L.L.C. v. Nomura Asset Capital Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Underpinning & Foundation Skanska, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010