United States v. James Marshall Shackelford (84-5995), Douglas McArthur Brooks (84-5998)
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WELLFORD, Circuit Judge.
James M. Shackelford and Douglas Brooks, defendants, appeal from jury convictions, Brooks for embezzling food goods shipped in interstate commerce, (18 U.S.C. § 659); and Shackelford for buying and receiving the embezzled food goods (18 U.S.C. § 659). On appeal defendants raise three assignments of error: (1) erroneous jury instructions; (2) failure to voir dire jurors about alleged outside influence; and (3) imposition of restitution as part of their sentence upon conviction.
I
The facts in this case are, for the most part, undisputed. In December 1983, defendant…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. Gordon PennellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. LemireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Roland A. SoulardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. John F. Hendrix, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by75 opinions
- Willie Williams, Jr. v. Margaret Bagley, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. David A. Sturman (90-3147) Ralph L. Levine (90-3148) Reuben Sturman (90-3151) and Melvin Kaminsky (90-3750)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Rosalind K. Reed, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.