Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
SAGE, District Judge.
The right of the interstate commerce commission to prescribe maximum rates for the transportation of freight was assumed by the commission, is contended for by their counsel, and is essential to their case. It is the right to dictate an indispensable and one of the most important terms of the contract between the carrier and the shipper. As a legislative right, so long and so generally recognized as to be beyond question, it results from the corporate existence of the common carrier, or from his quasi public relation to any and all who may come to him as freighters or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & O. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1890
- Cin., NO & Tex. Pac. Railway v. Int. Com. Com.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & N. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Tennessee · 1896
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Alabama Midland Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1896
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Shinkle, Wilson & Kreis Co. v. Louisville & N. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1896