Legal Opinion

Lochinvar Corp. v. Meyers

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided July 29, 1996No. 05-95-00657-CVPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, Justice.

Howard M. Meyers sued Loehinvar Corporation about a defective boiler manufactured by Loehinvar, claiming breach of warranties and deceptive trade practices. Following a two-day trial, the jury awarded damages and attorneys’ fees to Meyers. In four points of error, Loehinvar complains that the trial court erred by: (1) submitting a charge that was modified after the jury had retired; (2) denying Lochinvar’s motion for directed verdict based on limitations; (3) denying Lochinvar’s motion for directed verdict based on lack of notice; and (4) awarding attorneys’ fees to Meyers. In…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Croucher v. CroucherTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Juliette Fowler Homes, Inc. v. Welch Associates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. McCraw v. MarisTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Burns v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Clary Corp. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Thomas Mckay v. Novartis Pharmaceutical CorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  3. U.S. Tire-Tech, Inc. v. Boeran, B.V., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  4. Reese v. Duncan, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2002
  5. Carbona v. CH Medical, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API