Legal Opinion
Carter v. Peace Officers Standards & Training Board
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 10, 1996No. C2-95-2319PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
Appellant William Carter III brought this action against his former employer, respondent Minnesota Board of Peace Officer Standards and Training (Board), and respondent Richard Stanek, individually and in his official capacity as Board Chair. Carter alleged violation of the Minnesota Whistleblower Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 181.931-.935 (1992); unlawful “reprisals” and “aiding and abetting” in violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 363.01-15 (1992 & Supp.1993); infringement of free speech, due process, and equal protection in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983;…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Stuempges v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Elwood v. County of RiceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Rico v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Davis v. Hennepin CountyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Carter v. Peace Officers Standards & Training BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997