In re Antcliff
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
This proceeding was initiated by the Disciplinary Commission of this Court through a complaint alleging that the Respondent, Clifford G. Antcliff, violated the Rules of Professional Conduct. In general, the Respondent has been charged with violating Rules 1.15(a), (b), and (c) which define the requirements for the safekeeping of clients' funds and property and Rule 8.4(d) which prohibits an attorney from engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice.
Pursuant to Admission and Discipline Rule 23, Section 11(d), the parties have now tendered for our…
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of AntcliffIndiana Supreme Court · 1994