State v. Bailey
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Crothers, Justice.
[¶ 1] Precious Bailey appeals a criminal judgment entered after a jury found her guilty of possessing a controlled substance with the intent to deliver. Bailey argues the district court erred by excluding hearsay testimony after analyzing the credibility of the witness she wanted to testify on her behalf. We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] In September 2015 Bailey was arrested for driving under suspension. According to the affidavit of probable cause and as testified to at trial, a corrections officer felt something “crinkling” in Bailey’s bra while booking her into jail. The officer placed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. James E. RasmussenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- State v. VogelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. LefthandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. StrohNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State of Iowa v. Alex Cosmo MarcelinoCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2020