Legal Opinion

Saif Corp. v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 13, 1995No. 91-10443; CA A76540Published

1Per curiam

In SAIF v. Williams, 133 Or App 766, 893 P2d 577 (1995), on remand from the Supreme Court for reconsideration in the light of SAIF v. Allen, 320 Or 192, 881 P2d 773 (1994), we held that claimant was entitled to an attorney fee under ORS 656.386(1). SAIF sought review and the Supreme Court has again remanded, 321 Or 559, 901 P2d 246 (1995), this time for reconsideration in the light of ORS 656.368(1), as amended by Oregon Laws 1995, chapter 332, section 43.

Because the 1995 amendments may affect the outcome of this case, we remand to the Workers’ Compensation Board for reconsideration in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Saif Corp. v. AllenOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Santos v. TransportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. SAIF Corp. v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  4. SAIF Corp. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API