Continuous Extracting Press Corp. v. Eastern Cotton Oil Co.
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
In Equity. Suit by the Continuous Extracting Press Company against the Eastern Cotton Oil Company, in which the V. D. Anderson Company was allowed to intervene.
1Opinion of the Court
CONNOR, District Judge.
Plaintiff, a Virginia corporation, brings this suit in equity against defendant, a North Carolina corporation, in which it alleges: That prior to the 3d day of April, 1905, John C. Piddyment and John T. McNally were the first and original inventors of a new and useful invention in presses. That on the 27th day of March, 1906, letters patent No. 816,446 were issued to plaintiff corporation, which owned the same at the date of filing the bill herein, said Piddyment and McNally having assigned to plaintiff said invention, all of which would fully appear by reference to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hart Steel Co. v. Railroad Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Robbins v. Chicago CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Souffront v. La Compagnie Des Sucreries De Porto RicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Hubbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Chandler & Price Co. v. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- General Chemical Co. v. Standard Wholesale Phosphate & Acid Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
- Allington v. Shevlin-Hixon Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1924
- Demulso Corporation v. Tretolite Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Wenborne-Karpen Dryer Co. v. Dort Motor Car Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.