Legal Opinion

Nestle's Products (Malaya) Ltd. v. Osaka Shosen Kaisha

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 9, 1959PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PALMIERI, District Judge.

This is a libel by a Malayan consignee, against a Japanese shipowner, for damage to cargo shipped from Denmark to Singapore. The damage was apparently discovered when the cargo was unloaded, for further transhipment, in Japan. In addition to the carriage aboard the Japanese vessel, the cargo was carried, in the course of the shipment, on German and Liberian vessels, the latter controlled by Philippine nationals. The whole controversy appears to have no connection with the United States. Respondent moves for dismissal of the action on the ground of forum non conveniens.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The BelgenlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Williams v. Carolina Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. The ManduCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  4. Kloeckner Reederei Und Kohlenhandel, G.M.B.H. v. A/s Hakedal. The Western FarmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Michael v. SS THANASISDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1970
  2. Transomnia G.M.B.H. v. M/S ToryuDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  3. Chan Tse Ming v. Cordis Corp.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1989
  4. Alegria v. Grand Bassa Tankers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API