Legal Opinion
Chan Tse Ming v. Cordis Corp.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided January 18, 1989No. 87-2209-CivPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FORUM NON CONVENIENS
HASTINGS, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon review of the magistrate’s Report and Recommendation, dated August 4, 1988 (hereinafter “Report”) regarding Defendant’s motion to dismiss on the basis of forum, non conveniens. That Report recommended granting the motion and dismissing the case. After careful consideration of the motion, response, reply, objec tions, 1 memoranda and a de novo review of the record, it is
ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is DENIED. The magistrate’s Report is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Edward L. Greenblatt v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Ronald Basil Hart, Jr. v. Yamaha-Parts Distributors, Inc., Yamaha International Corporation, Yamaha Motor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Van Schijndel v. Boeing Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2006
- McLane v. Marriott International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
- In Re Cessna 208 Series Aircraft Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- Fihe v. Rexall Sundown, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- McLane v. Marriott International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2010