Legal Opinion

Piggly-Wiggly Alabama Co. v. Rickles

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 9, 1925No. 6 Div. 261PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

Appellee declared in three counts: (1) For an assault and battery; (2) for false imprisonment; and (3) malicious prosecution. Defendant, appellant, had the general charge as to count 2, and the cause was submitted to tbe jury on counts 1 and 3.

In the first place it is insisted that defendant was entitled to the general affirmative instruction which was requested in separate charges upon the case as a whole, and upon each of counts 1 and 3. The corresponding assignments of error are grouped together in appellant’s brief, but the supporting argument is addressed to the case as made by the court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Ewing v. SanfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
  3. Veid v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Fowlkes v. LewisAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. Sandlin v. AndersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Delchamps, Inc. v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Nat. SEC. Fire & Cas. Co. v. BowenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  3. S.S. Kresge Co. v. RubySupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Union Indemnity Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  5. Alabama Power Co. v. NeighborsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API