Piggly-Wiggly Alabama Co. v. Rickles
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.
Appellee declared in three counts: (1) For an assault and battery; (2) for false imprisonment; and (3) malicious prosecution. Defendant, appellant, had the general charge as to count 2, and the cause was submitted to tbe jury on counts 1 and 3.
In the first place it is insisted that defendant was entitled to the general affirmative instruction which was requested in separate charges upon the case as a whole, and upon each of counts 1 and 3. The corresponding assignments of error are grouped together in appellant’s brief, but the supporting argument is addressed to the case as made by the court…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Ewing v. SanfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
- Veid v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Fowlkes v. LewisAlabama Court of Appeals · 1914
- Sandlin v. AndersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
3Cited by14 opinions
- Delchamps, Inc. v. BryantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Nat. SEC. Fire & Cas. Co. v. BowenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- S.S. Kresge Co. v. RubySupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Union Indemnity Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Alabama Power Co. v. NeighborsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.