Legal Opinion
Uraseal, Inc. v. Electric Motion Co.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided February 11, 1998No. CV-95-517-SDPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Uraseal, Inc. v . Electric Motion Co. CV-95-517-SD 02/11/98 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Uraseal, Inc. v. Civil No. 95-517-SD Electric Motion Company, Inc. O R D E R In this patent infringement action, plaintiff Uraseal, Inc., alleges that defendent Electric Motion Company, Inc., is manufacturing and marketing ground clamps (“EMC ground clamps”) that infringe United States Letters Patent No. 4,842,530 (the ‘530 patent) owned by Uraseal. Before the court is defendant’s motion for summary judgment, to which plaintiff objects. Facts In June 1989, the ‘530 patent…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Sage Products, Inc. v. Devon Industries, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Autogiro Company of America v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Hilton Davis Chemical Co. v. Warner-Jenkinson Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Royal Typewriter Co. v. Remington Rand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.