Legal Opinion

State v. Madsen

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 2009No. 24654PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1.] Defendant was arrested and convicted for drug-related crimes using evidence seized by security guards at a hotel owned and operated by the Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe. Defendant claimed the search violated either the Indian Civil Rights Act, or the Fourth Amendment, and that the evidence seized should be suppressed. The circuit court denied Defendant’s motion to suppress the evidence. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] On January 12, 2007, the Defendant Harry L. Madsen (Madsen) rented a hotel suite at the Royal River Casino and Hotel in Flandreau, South…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. OverbeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. RaliosSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. Doap Deng ChuolSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. ThunderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. EvansSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API