Legal Opinion
State v. Thunder
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 6, 2010No. 25164PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEVERSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Barry Glenn Thunder (Thunder) appeals his conviction of rape and possession and manufacture of child pornography. The sole issue is whether Officer Flogstad violated Thunder’s right against unreasonable searches when he viewed, without consent, a warrant, or exigent circumstances, videos stored on a cell phone Thunder used. The circuit court denied Thunder’s motion to suppress. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
[¶ 2.] Thunder began living at 3520 North Eighth Avenue in Sioux Falls, South Dakota, in September 2007. Dean Wilson owned the home, but leased it to Harry Thunder (Harry),…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. HarrisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. PodzimekSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. PodzimekSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. ZahnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.