Legal Opinion

Atlas Assur. Co. of London v. Fairchild

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 5, 1935No. 24045PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was instituted in the district court of Choctaw county by C. G. Messer, agent of W. A. Pairchild, as plaintiff, against the Atlas Assurance Company of London, as defendant, to recover on a fire insurance policy issued by the defendant to W. A. Fairchild, for a loss sustained by the said W. A. Pairchild by reason of the burning of the building upon which said policy of insurance was issued. For convenience the parties will be herein referred to as they appeared in the court below.

C. G. Messer, as agent for W. A. Pair-child, and appearing as plaintiff, filed his petition in the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bauserman v. BluntSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Lilly v. TobbeinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  3. Batre v. Auze's heirsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1843
  4. White v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Bauserman v. CharlottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. American National Bank of Enid v. CrewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Saint Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Co. v. SpannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. Midland Valley R. Co. v. TownesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. JamisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. Dierks v. WalshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API