Goetsch v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
The defendant presents the following issues on this appeal:(1) Did the trial court err in allowing the expert testimony of Drs. Geocaris and McFall into evidence without requiring the introduction of the actual tests and report;(2) Was the evidence sufficient to support the trial court’s determination that the defendant was in need of specialized treatment under the Sex Crimes Act?
Admissibility of Testimony.
The allegedly objectionable testimony of Dr. McFall consisted of his description of the department’s tests and his interpretation of their results. In explaining the various tests employed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Buchanan v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
- Grunwaldt v. State Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
3Cited by15 opinions
- Humphrey v. CadySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State of Arizona v. Eric BoystonArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- Mitchell v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- United States v. Thomas GavicCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- State v. RamsdellSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.