Beatty v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
WHITAKER, Judge.
This case is before the court on Senate Resolution 115, 84th Congress, 1st Session, referring to us plaintiffs’ claims for a report thereon, giving findings of fact and stating our conclusions on whether or not plaintiffs have legal or equitable claims, and the amounts, if any, legally or equitably due from the United States.
The United States desired to purchase plaintiffs’ property for the Canyon Ferry Reservoir in Montana, to be created by the erection of a dam on the Missouri River. Negotiations were entered into, with the result that plaintiffs voluntarily sold their…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Automatic Radio Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Hazeltine Research, IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Automatic Radio Mfg. Co. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1949
- Du Puy v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1929
- Moseley v. Owensboro Municipal Housing CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
- Roelvink v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
3Cited by14 opinions
- Loesch v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Collins v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
- Rough Diamond Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- Irene E. Mills and Florence E. Mahoney v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.