Legal Opinion
Rick v. Noble
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 17, 1936No. 30,597PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 264 N.W. 685. Certiorari by the employer and insurer, relators, to review an order of the referee and order of the industrial commission affirming the findings of fact and allowance of compensation and medical expenses made by the referee to the petitioner, William Rick. One commissioner dissented.
There was a motion by petitioner to dismiss the writ ofcertiorari on the claimed ground that the relators' attorneys had issued certain drafts on the insurer for compensation and expenses of nursing. The insurer refused to honor the draft for compensation. There is nothing in these…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Angell v. White Eagle Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Nesseth v. Skelly Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Hasslen v. Carlson & HasslenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- Schullo v. Village of NashwaukSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Kostelec v. A. Guthrie & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Barlau v. Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Larson v. Le MereSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Farnam v. Linden Hills Congregational ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Christopherson v. Security State Bank of OkleeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Bergstrom v. BrehmerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.