Legal Opinion

Myers v. Columbus Sales Pavilion, Inc.

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided March 7, 1983No. CV82-L-95PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

URBOM, Chief Judge.

The plaintiff by filing 11 and the defendant by filing 8 have moved for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

A motion for summary judgment may properly be granted if there remains no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The material facts in this ease are not in dispute and have largely been stipulated to by the parties. The plaintiff is a citizen of Iowa who is self-employed as an order buyer of livestock. The defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Crossley v. Pacific Employers InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Shull v. Dain, Kalman & Quail, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sky Technology Partners, LLC v. Midwest Research InstituteDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
  2. Enron Corporation v. Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation, Enron Corporation v. Lawyers Title Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  3. In re TraudtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API