Shull v. Dain, Kalman & Quail, Inc.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcCown, J.
This is a declaratory judgment action to determine the usury limit applicable to funds advanced by defendant to plaintiff under the provisions of a stock margin contract. The District Court determined that the usury law of Minnesota was applicable to the margin contract and had been applied, and dismissed plaintiff’s petition. Plaintiff has appealed.
The case was tried on a stipulation of facts. The plaintiff, Daniel L. Shull, is a resident of Lincoln, Nebraska, and was a customer of the defendant beginning in 1968. The defendant, Dain, Kalman & Quail, Inc., is a Delaware corporation engaged…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gamer v. duPont Glore Forgan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Kinney Loan & Finance Co. v. SumnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
- Dunlop Tire & Rubber Corp. v. RyanNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
- Exchange Bank & Trust Co. v. TameriusNebraska Supreme Court · 1978
- U. S. Manganese Corporation, Preston W. Grace, Preston W. Grace, Jr., and Charles B. Grace v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
3Cited by9 opinions
- Powell v. American Charter Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Modern Computer Systems, Inc. v. Modern Banking Systems, Inc. Modern Banking Systems of Southern WisconsinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- McHenry County Credit Co. v. FeuerhelmCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983
- Myers v. Columbus Sales Pavilion, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1983
- Beber v. Navsav Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2023
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.