Legal Opinion

Fick v. Wolfinger

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 12, 1972No. 42879PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam.

Plaintiff, Frederick Carl Fick, injured while working as a farmhand when he came in contact with an unguarded power takeoff shaft supplying power from a tractor to a rotary chopper, brought this suit for negligence against his employers, Joe and Mary Lou Wolfinger, and the owner of the rotary chopper, Alvin Vieths. Plaintiff’s claim against defendant Vieths was dismissed at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case. Plaintiff’s claim against defendants Wolfinger was decided against him by the jury’s answers to seven interrogatories. The jury found that plaintiff was 70 percent negligent…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Springrose v. WillmoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  2. Schwartz v. Minneapolis Suburban Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. McCourtie v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. Goodsell v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  5. Olberg v. Minneapolis Gas CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Presbyterian Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Cornfeldt v. TongenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Gieseke v. IDCA, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  4. Blades v. DaFoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  5. Carrano v. Yale-New Haven HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API