Legal Opinion

Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Protective National Insurance Co. of Omaha

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 26, 1993No. 92-1616PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by the defendant Aetna Casualty & Surety Company [Aetna], a primary general liability insurance carrier, from an adverse final summary judgment finding it vicariously liable for the negligence of the attorney it selected to defend its insured *306[when the attorney failed to raise a meritorious statute of limitations defense in a personal injury suit] — so that the plaintiff Protective National Insurance Company of Omaha, an excess general liability insurance carrier, was entitled in an equitable subrogation action to recover the monies it extended in partially paying off the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Merritt v. Reserve InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. Harvey Thomas Smoot, Jr. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  3. Continental Insurance Co. v. Bayless & Roberts, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Feliberty v. DamonNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Brown v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Horwitz v. Holabird & RootIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. TraverTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Lifestar Response of Alabama, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  4. Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Royal Oak Enterprises, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2004
  5. Ingersoll-Rand Equipment Corp. v. Transportation InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API