Legal Opinion

In re Pinney

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Application- for -a- peremptory writ of mandamus against the hoard of supervisors.of Richmond county. ' ■

1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.

The petitioner, who is district- attorney of Richmond., county, presented to the board of supervisors of that county' for audit a' claim for moneys expended by him in performing the-duties of.his office. ■ The board rejected several items, and the 'petitioner asks for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the board to audit and allow the same. Section 230 of the County Raw provides that ,“ all expenses' necessarily incurred by the district attorney in criminal actions or proceedings arising in his county,” shall be a county charge: '

The four items disallowed áre as follows:

“Jan. 1 to date.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People Ex Rel. Gardenier v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Union Bank of BrooklynNew York Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API