Legal Opinion

In re Union Bank of Brooklyn

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1916PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Application by petitioner for an order directing him to declare and pay ont of the funds of the Union Bank of Brooklyn, now in his possession, a dividend of five per centum upon the claims allowed, etc.

1Opinion of the CourtBenedict, J.

The petitioner prays that “ an order may be made herein authorizing and directing him to declare and pay out of the funds of the Union Bank of Brooklyn, now in his possession available for such purpose, a dividend of five per centum upon the claims allowed, less any offsets which may be claimed or ascertained against any of such creditors, and, further, that your petitioner be authorized, in his discretion, to pay the amount of this dividend upon all cla’ms which may hereafter be allowed by him against said Union Bank of Brooklyn.”

*301Notice of the application was given as required by statute,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Matter of Mahon v. . Bd. of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Hatch v. MannCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1835
  3. In Re the Matter of the Examination of the Union BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Carpenter v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. People v. . SutherlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kidder v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. In re the Union Bank of BrooklynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  3. Kinney v. Channel State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  4. Richards v. ScharmannNew York Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Held v. HallNew York Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API