Legal Opinion

People v. Hood

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 1962No. Crim. 3995PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

Convicted after trial by jury of the felonies of assault with intent to commit rape (Pen. Code, § 220) and oral copulation (Pen. Code, § 288a) by force and against the victim’s will, appellant now urges an alleged insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict as well as errors in the court’s instructions. Appellant gives us no specific references to the transcript to show in what respects such failure matures. We see no advantage in a detailed narration of the sordid circumstances of the crimes; we shall point out briefly that the evidence amply upholds the verdict and that the court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. People v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. People v. MullenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. People v. HouseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. GreeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  2. People v. BardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Larson v. SolbakkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. People v. CortezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. People v. SotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API