Legal Opinion

People v. Mullen

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 11, 1941No. Crim. 3459PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

Defendant appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial after a judgment of conviction of the crime of making an assault with intent by force and violence to commit rape. The appeal is predicated upon the insufficiency of the evidence. There is no other issue. The only two witnesses who testified were the prosecuting witness and the defendant.

Disregarding the testimony of defendant, the record supporting the judgment is the testimony of the prosecutrix which in substance follows: On November 28, 1940, in response to an advertisement, I called at the appellant’s dance studio where I…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. NorringtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  2. People v. FlemingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. People v. MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. People v. OnessimoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. David Luther Ghent v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. People v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. People v. CassandrasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. People v. GreeneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. People v. BardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API