Legal Opinion

Regadanz v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1908No. 21,259PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Prom Huntington Circuit Court; Samuel E. Cook, Judge. Prosecution by The State of Indiana against Charles Regadanz. Prom a judgment of conviction, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGillett, J.

Omitting its formal parts, .the. affidavit herein, punctuated as it appears in the record, is as follows: “That Charles Regadanz on the 23d day of March, A. D. 1907, at.and in said county aforesaid, was then and there unlawfully found in possession of intoxicating liquors, which intoxicating liquors were kept for the purpose of being sold by said Charles Regadanz, he, said Charles Regadanz, not then and there having a license to sell intoxicating liquors, in less quantities than five gallons, according to the laws of such State, contrary, ’ ’ etc. After unsuccessfully moving to quash,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. MacKenzie v. CasteelIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Donovan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Littell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Yazel v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Walker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1864

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Meno v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Bass v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
  3. State v. Rardon State v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Scherer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Rigrish v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API