Legal Opinion
Marsh v. Fowler
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided September 9, 1960PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swepston
This case is here by reason of the action of the trial court in sustaining the defendants’ demurrer to the declaration.
The declaration alleges in substance the following:
That plaintiff David Marsh, Jr., a colored boy 17 years of age, was employed on the farm of defendants at Cedar Springs Farm in Walker County, Georgia, where his duties consisted among other things of cutting hay with a tractor and pulling the hay bailer, riding a horse to check up and round up cattle and drive them to the barn to be fed; that he had been employed in such capacity since *379some indefinite time preceding the 21st…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Duncan v. Dickie Rector Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1948
- Gray v. HinesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
3Cited by5 opinions
- Colonial Refrigerated TransPortation, Inc. v. WorshamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Dorothy I. MacPherson v. Charles R. MacPhersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- Merritt v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
- Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. TempletonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1962
- Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc. And Excalibur Insurance Company v. Kenneth Worsham D/B/A Worsham Trucking Company and Christopher Worsham, Defendant-Third Party v. North Carolina Occidental Fire and Casualty Company, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983