Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Weisflog's Showroom Gallery, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided August 23, 2006No. 2005AP1287PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

¶ 1. In this appeal, an insurance company attempts to apply certain "business risk" exclusions to preclude coverage where its insured incurs liability for misrepresentation pursuant to Wis. Admin. Code § ATCP 110.02. The policy does include representations about work as an item excluded from the policy by the "your work" exclusion. However, the legislature created code liability with the specific purpose of remedying deficiencies not addressed by common-law mis representation. We assume if the insurer meant to lump this distinct sort of misrepresentation claim along with common-law claims, it…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. PettitCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  2. Tietsworth v. Harley-Davidson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Doyle v. EngelkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Cieslewicz Ex Rel. Finerty v. Mutual Service Casualty InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. LangridgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stuart v. Weisflog's Showroom Gallery, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Eberts v. GoderstadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  3. Employers Ins. Co. of Wausau v. THE MARLEY CO.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2006
  4. Eric Eberts v. Torge GoderstadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. Stuart v. Weisflog's Showroom Gallery, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API