Sullenbarger v. Ahrens
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Benton District Cov,rt. — Hon. C. B. Bradshaw, Judge. Plaintiff filed his claim against the executors in the sum of $3,435. There was a trial to a jury, which resulted in a verdict, and allowance of the claim in the sum of $3,335. Defendants filed a counterclaim for precisely the same amount for room rent and board alleged to have been furnished plain tiff by deceased, but the counterclaim was withdrawn. . Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.
error : "brief: errors identified. l. appeal and I. It is contended by appellants in their brief that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of plain-as Personal transactions and communications contrary to Sec. 4604 of the Code. The argument is, as they state it, that: “the testimony of Mr. Sullenbarger from beginning to end has, in a roundabout way, brought out exactly what is prohibited by Sec. 4604. We do not point out any specific places in the abstract.” The errors relied upon for a reversal are not more specific than the argument except in one particular, which will be hereafter…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wise v. OuttrimSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- State v. TippetSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Bowie v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
- Chariton National Bank v. WhicherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Keen v. Mid-Continent Petroleum CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1945
- Gabelmann v. NFO, INC.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1997
- Knight v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Gaulden v. RamseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1920
- Scott v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.