Legal Opinion

Whitlock v. Hilander Foods, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 29, 1999No. 2 — 98—1421PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE BOWMAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

• Plaintiff, Jonathan Spafford Whitlock, as land trustee, holds the title to property directly south of property on which defendant, Hilander Foods, Inc., has long operated a grocery store. Recently, defendant built an addition to the store. The south retaining wall of the addition is on defendant’s property, but the underground footings of the wall encroach on plaintiffs property. Plaintiff sued for a mandatory injunction compelling defendant to remove the encroachment and for other relief. The trial court granted defendant summary…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Espinoza v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Allegro Services, Ltd. v. Metropolitan Pier & Exposition AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Tully v. StateIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Nitterauer v. PulleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Ariola v. NigroIllinois Supreme Court · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. County of Kendall v. RosenwinkelAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. Renaissance Development Corp. v. Universal Properties Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  3. Vandeleigh Industries, LLC v. Storage Partners of Kirkwood, LLCSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  4. County of Kendall v. RosenwinkelAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  5. Larson v. McMooreHigh Court of American Samoa · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API