Jones v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co., Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
FEIKENS, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Before me is defendant’s motion for summary judgment of plaintiffs’ disparate impact discrimination claims. Because plaintiffs have failed to establish that defendant’s selection process had a statistically significant adverse impact on members of plaintiff class who belong to various statutorily protected groups 1 , defendant’s motion is granted. 2
II. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs’ class action against defendant, Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company, Inc. (“Pepsi” or the “Company”) arises out of the administration of the Company’s…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hazelwood School District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Salvador Hernandez-EstradaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Association of Mexican-American Educators v. CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1996
- Ogletree v. City of AuburnDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2009
- Douglas v. Mitzelfeld's, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- Gill v. Suburban Cadillac of Lansing, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.