Porter v. United States Agency for International Development
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
ROBERTSON, District Judge.
After a jury awarded him compensatory damages for retaliation in his employment discrimination action against USAID, Mel vin Porter filed a petition for equitable relief. He included a request for attorneys’ fees in that petition and asked that I “gross up” the fee award to cover any tax liability a fee award might entail. I declined to rule on the attorneys’ fee request while considering Porter’s prayer for retroactive promotion, back pay, and injunc-tive relief, and I declined to decide the tax “gross up” question, finding the issue not then ripe…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chuong Van Pham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Chuong Van Pham v. Seattle City LightWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Porter v. FulghamDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Porter v. NatsiosDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009