Legal Opinion

Porter v. United States Agency for International Development

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 25, 2003No. CIV.A. 00-1954(JR)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

ROBERTSON, District Judge.

After a jury awarded him compensatory damages for retaliation in his employment discrimination action against USAID, Mel vin Porter filed a petition for equitable relief. He included a request for attorneys’ fees in that petition and asked that I “gross up” the fee award to cover any tax liability a fee award might entail. I declined to rule on the attorneys’ fee request while considering Porter’s prayer for retroactive promotion, back pay, and injunc-tive relief, and I declined to decide the tax “gross up” question, finding the issue not then ripe…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Newman v. Piggie Park Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chuong Van Pham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Chuong Van Pham v. Seattle City LightWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Porter v. FulghamDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  4. Porter v. NatsiosDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API