Legal Opinion

State v. Killian

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 24, 1972No. 7226SC177PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

The defendant assigns as error the Court’s denial of his timely motion for judgment as of nonsuit. Although the evidence in this case reveals a rather bizarre situation, we think it sufficient to require the submission of the case to the jury and to support the verdict.

The defendant contends:

“. . . (T)he Court erred in denying defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment as pronounced in this case because of a material variance in the bill of indictment and the proof of ownership of property alleged stolen.”

In State v. Cotten, 2 N.C. App. 305, 163 S.E. 2d 100 (1968), it is said:

“The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. State v. CottenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. LiddellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API