Legal Opinion
State v. Dillard
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 4, 1984No. C2-84-297PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POPOVICH, Chief Judge.
Appellant was convicted by a jury of simple robbery in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 609.24 and 609.05 (1982) following a jury trial. Appellant was sentenced to 30 months in prison. On appeal, appellant contends: (1) the evidence presented at trial was not sufficient to support a conviction for simple robbery, (2) he was denied a fair trial because of alleged trial court errors and prosecutorial misconduct and (3) there were substantial and compelling reasons for the court to depart from the presumptive sentence. We affirm.
FACTS
Between 3:15 and 3:45 p.m., April 13,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. KindemSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- State v. CaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
- Herme v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Marshall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. HazleyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.