Legal Opinion
Southern California Edison Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 24, 2006No. 04-1396PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN.
BROWN, Circuit Judge.
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission certified intervenor Ormesa LLC (Ormesa) as a qualifying geothermal small power production facility, entitling it to certain privileges pursuant to Section 210 of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA), 16 U.S.C. § 824a-3. In particular, the certification permitted Ormesa to compel traditional utilities to purchase Ormesa’s net power output. Southern California Edison Co. (Edison), a utility that has a power purchase agreement with Ormesa, petitions for review,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- American Paper Institute, Inc. v. American Electric Power Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- McBryde v. Committee to Review Circuit Council Conduct & Disability Orders of the Judicial Conference of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- beethoven.com LLC v. Librarian of Congress, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Exxonmobil Oil Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and United States of America, Western Refining Company, L.P., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- ExxonMobil Oil Corp v. FERCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Swecker v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022